bionlm.blogg.se

1. #Game graphic card benchmark 1080p#
2. #Game graphic card benchmark driver#
3. #Game graphic card benchmark upgrade#
4. #Game graphic card benchmark series#

Take the following with a healthy dose of skepticism and a liberal sprinkling of salt, in other words, but it does contain a list of just about every major desktop GPU from the past 25 years. And no, the 16GB card doesnt have any tangible performance benefits over the 8GB version. As one recent example, AMD's new RX 7900 XTX/XT sit in spots two and three even though the RTX 4080 generally beats the 7900 XT. These results are, at best, merely theoretical and we don't have recent benchmarks for most of the GPUs. Comparing pre-2007 GPUs against each other should be relatively meaningful, but trying to compare those older GPUs against newer GPUs gets a bit convoluted. We've put an asterisk (*) next to the GPU names for those cards, and they comprise the latter part of the table. That's GeForce 7 and Radeon X1000 and earlier - basically anything from before 2007.

#Game graphic card benchmark 1080p#

Granted you probably should keep it on Low at 1080p and not go any. The Advanced 3D Graphics Test has been designed to benchmark the how well your video card performs when using the most common features of DirectX. We sorted the table by the theoretical GFLOPS, though on architectures that don't support unified shaders, we only have data for "Gops/s" (giga operations per second). The MSI Radeon R9 380 ’s FPS performance in Call of Duty Warzone is surprisingly alright. The list below is mostly intended to show relative performance between architectures from a similar time period.

Note that we also don't factor in memory bandwidth or features like AMD's Infinity Cache or Nvidia's larger L2 cache on Ada Lovelace.

#Game graphic card benchmark driver#

We have not tested most of these cards in many years, driver support has ended on most of these models, and the relative rankings are pretty coarse. You can use these older results to help inform your purchase decisions, if you don't typically run the latest games at maxed out settings.Ģ020–2021 GPU Hierarchy (No Longer Updated) Header Cell - Column 0īelow is our legacy desktop GPU hierarchy dating back to the late 1990s. Use desired Game Quality Settings, Display Resolution, Graphics card, and Processor combinations to see comparison performance tests in 50+ game FPS.

#Game graphic card benchmark upgrade#

We won't be adding future GPUs to this table, so there's no RTX 40-series, RX 7000-series, Arc, 3090 Ti, 6950 XT, 6750 XT, or 6650 XT, but it does help to provide a look at a slightly less demanding suite of games, where 6GB or more VRAM isn't generally required at 1080p ultra settings. Using this advanced GPU Comparison tool, compare two graphics cards or compare your current PC build - graphics card and processor - with a future upgrade and see if it is worth the upgrade. These results have not been updated since early 2022, when we added the RTX 3050 and RX 6500 XT to the list. All of the scores are combined (via a geometric mean calculation) into a single overall result, which tends to penalize the fastest and slowest GPUs - CPU bottlenecks come into play at 1080p medium, while VRAM limitations can kill performance at 4K ultra.

#Game graphic card benchmark series#

Fur rendering is especially adapted to overheat the GPU and that's why FurMark is also a stability and stress test tool (also called GPU burner) for the graphics card.įurMark requires an OpenGL 2.0 compliant graphics card: Nvidia GeForce 6 (and higher), AMD Radeon 9600 (and higher), Intel HD Graphics 2000/3000 or a S3 Graphics Chrome 400 series with the latest graphics drivers. FurMark is a very intensive OpenGL benchmark that uses fur rendering algorithms to measure the performance of graphics cards.